Hi IQ Users !
IQ has many ways to create links, so how about a pane dedicated to links:
- The links pane would show a unified view of all items, files and URL linked to the current item or items
- The view would show a tabular list or 2-D surface of all links
- A dropdown will allow users to select which link types to view (or all).
For example, children may not be pertinent when the item is viewed in a grid as it is already shown there - In tabular view, columns would be the link (item text, file, URL), link type, link sub-type, link depth
- Currently IQ has 7 types of link: Parent, Child, Common Field, Common Tag, Related Items, Task Link, Hyperlink:
- Parents: Flat list of all parents, grand-parents, etc
- Children: Flat list of all children, grand-children, etc
- Fields: For a user specified list of fields, all items that have a value (or the same value) for this field
- Tags: All items that have a common tag with support for tag inheritance
- Related Items: All items that are linked through Related Items, show depth level
- Unlinked References: Items that contains text that references this item (i.e. that includes the item name)
- Task Links: For Gantt / Next tasks links, show all items that are predecessors or descendants, show depth level
- Hype
- Embedded in text (any text field, such as item, notes, Doc pane)
- Through fields, such as FileRef, URL and ItemHTMLFile
rlinks: 2 types:
Pierre_Admin
IQ Designer
Suggestions
Comments
Can we please have a way to sort related items into categories, either via their home grid or defined via a search query? For example "related items from the ideas home grid" versus "related items from the comments home grid"?
I would love to have those as columns in my grid or in the new links pane, with the clickable hyperlinks the way the Related Items column works now. I would rather not keep creating and closing scratch grids, so that I can have speedy overviews looking down rows of multiple items.
Or perhaps related items are not the best way to link many items, since the documentation says they are "ad-hoc"? Should I use parent-child links as the main connection point between items of different "types" that are in different grids?
Looking forward to hear your thoughts. Thank you!
It could be obvious but in order not to miss one important functionality that I am not aware of regarding connecting items in separate grids, will you please explain what you mean by "showing a set of items in a specific grid" with one or two specific examples?
Thank you.
Alp
What's the latest on the links pane? Is it coming soon? I've started making extensive use of both hyperlinks and related items in my CRM IQbase. This pane would give me a lot of flexibility to use hyperlinks in named fields (to describe the link type) instead of using unspecified "related items".
On a related note, the Ctrl+R keyboard shortcut for Item > Link Items(Related) wasn't active in my program, so I had to add it as a custom shortcut. Is it just me or do other people have the same?
Thanks!
As of v117pre14, selecting…
As of v117pre14, selecting View > Links does not show a Links pane, and has no effect. Is this a bug or just a "not yet implemented feature"?
Indeed, I'll hide the…
Indeed, I'll hide the command until it is implemented
(Evernote sync got inserted to the top of the list, so we're still a few months away before work resumes on the Links pane)