One of the things I love about InfoQube is the information density it offers. It makes it convenient to have a lot of info visible on the screen. To that end, I have developed a system of using emojis to signify a variety of meaningful attributes and ways I can filter, or just visually search for needed info. It seems our brains are much quicker at catching colored shapes, even complex ones, than putting letters together and getting the meaning of the words they spell as we scan a page. So emojis work better for how our visual brains pick out connections to what's on the page before us.
My UX with Emoji in IQ:
Currently, IQ only displays emojis in the font color, typically black. This means we lose the eye-catching impact of colored emojis. This has become foundational to how I work with the many apps that support colored emojis. All modern apps support colored emojis, not just in certain conditions but anywhere and everywhere. Having this available in IQ would be a game-changer and would update it so it has greater usability in today's world. I would much prefer to use InfoQube over the other apps that are well packaged and offer some benefits. But they are just not InfoQube.😁
Windows 11 has a shortcut for entering emojis in all Windows apps that accept them. I set up FastKeys shortcuts to enter emojis. Neither option works in InfoQube (it just shows two question marks). I can copy and paste them from another app into IQ, but they appear only in the font color.
Why It Matters to Me:
Because of how far I have taken the development of my emoji-infused system, IQ does not support the most important work I would otherwise use it for. I want InfoQube to be my go-to for the demanding work I expect it to handle. Pierre, you have made a robust and potent tool for us to benefit from. What can be done, hopefully soon, to have InfoQube show the rest of the world what it can do, with colored emojis included?
This Is Not About Cosmetics:
Please don't think of emojis as dressing up documents to make them cute or pretty. I have found they uplevel my ability to be effective and productive with my time and energy in a profound way. For me, colored emojis have fundamentally changed how effectively I can process and manage information. They allow me to recognize patterns, identify categories, and find what I need with far less cognitive effort. That directly translates into greater productivity and better use of my time and attention.
I would love to see InfoQube support this.
Could colored emoji support be added to InfoQube?
I have no idea what it takes to make this happen in IQ. I hope it's easy. If it isn't, I will push harder to find a way to motivate Pierre so we can benefit from this feature, which is taken for granted in other modern apps.
What do the rest of you think?
What do you other IQ Jockeys have to say about this idea? Can we leverage some influence to get Pierre to include this much-needed upgrade to IQ? What do you all say?
And, thanks, Pierre, for continuing to give us such a powerful tool to work with.
Thanks for your consideration.
Cheers!
To recap:
Full-color emoji support would:
Make visual scanning dramatically more effective for users who rely on emoji as metadata.
Preserve the visual distinctions that emojis were designed to provide.
Bring InfoQube in line with the behavior users now expect from modern Windows applications.
Allow Windows 11's emoji input and tools such as FastKeys to work as intended.
Make it possible to build richer visual systems for organizing and interpreting dense information.
Potentially open up entirely new ways for IQ users to leverage visual cues within their grids and documents.
Comments
Full emoji support would be…
Full emoji support would be great, but I'm just posting this comment to endorse what you said about "information density". I think that phrase hits upon something very important. I agree that is a great feature of IQ. I often want information density in the apps that I use. And in so many apps the ability to get a dense information view has been sacrificed in favor of "aesthetics".
Thanks for flagging this,…
Thanks for flagging this, Jim. I don't know whose aesthetics these modern apps are designed for. They may look good, but their use of screen space is, in my view, severely lacking. To me, being able to use emojis is part of my vision of functional information density. When I use these modern info managers and emojis, I still get frustrated by the wasted space that could be put to use. It will be so good to have colored emojis in InfoQube! I hope others agree.
Hi Chris and Jim, I 100%…
Hi Chris and Jim,
I 100% agree with you w.r.t. information density and how other apps don't consider it in their design choices.
As to color emoji, my initial testing isn't very promising. I'll keep working on it during my spare time, but don't get your hopes too high !
Have you considered using the already available icon list ? Do you know that you add your own too ? AFAICR, it is supported in grids and in the item editor...
HTH !
Pierre_Admin
IQ Designer
Hi Pierre, Thanks much…
Here’s what I found:
Positive results in the Doc Pane:
Can I help you resolve this:
Hi Chris, Excellent. Did you…
Hi Chris,
Excellent. Did you copy your 32x32 gif files to the IQ \Icons folder and restart IQ? When I do this, it seems to work fine... I can do further tests if you wish.
see 1. Working with Icons
Hello Pierre, Update…
Hello Pierre,
Update Mon17Aug26
I have continued investing my time in checking out InfoQube for use with icons. I keep hoping we'll find a way to keep Icons from disappearing. It is, of course, a no-go if information is lost or degraded somehow. I have seen the icon file names continue to be listed in the Info window, even after they have disappeared from the Grid. To see this, click on "Info" at the bottom of the context menu when you right-click on a cell in the grid.
Yes, I have put the icons in the InfoQube Icon folder. I have the various icon sizes stashed in different folders and swap the different sizes out for testing.
All the options to get icons into cells in the grid are great to use. Esp. Item Edit with the right click. 👍
Icon Size:
24x24 icons show enough detail to make a distinction, unlike the small, blob-filled 16x16 icons.
As an example, here's one in 16x16
Hi Chris, We'll find the…
Hi Chris,
We'll find the cause of the icon issue, no doubt.
2 cases possible:
Indeed, the manual is incorrect, GIF files do not need to be 16x16, other sizes should work just fine
re alignment, in my tests, it shows centered:
Hi Pierre, Thanks for…
Hi Pierre,
Thanks for keeping the conversation going.
One of the things that's happened, I realize, is that I have changed my file naming scheme, and so file names have changed. This is the culprit in several of my tests. But even when I correct them as indicated in the HTML codes, I still get confusing results. In the screenshot below, you can see the icons in row 21 that I am editing. The editing window shows the icons. The cell does not.
Same result when clicking on the cell to edit it. These file names are correct, for sure.
I don't see how to send you the file through the forum here. Here is the file list pasted as it is now.
I am encouraged to hear you're confident we can get through this. Thanks again.
Cheers,
Chris
Thanks for the information, …
Thanks for the information,
Hi Pierre, I am confident I…
Hi Pierre,
I am confident I relaunched IQ each time I made changes to the icons folder and wanted to see the changes.
For the last couple of days, I have taken screenshots of the IQ window with the test icons I have input (and checked that the referenced image files are correct) before shutting down my PC for the night. On rebooting in the morning, I have compared the screenshot to what's in the freshly opened app, and everything checks out okay. The icons are good.
I still want them to show in the size I have chosen: 24x24 or 32x32. In display mode, they show up as 16x16. Is there a way to have them show as 24x24 or 32x32 without editing?
Thanks, Pierre.
Cheers,
Chris
I still want them to show in…
I see the 32x32 icon in display and edit modes, as shown in the previous post. So it is definitely possible. Not sure why it isn't working for you.
You're the man to solve this…
You're the man to solve this mystery. 😁
Thanks, Pierre.