I would like to suggest that perhaps actually using rich text instead of html for note bodies could be advantageous. Perhaps you could make this an optional setting.

I sometimes insert Excel tables, or Visio or AutoCAD drawings into rich text documents. Using the native format makes it easy to edit the table / diagram and gives me full access to the program used to create the graphical / numerical parts of the document when I need to edit these.

It is easy to do the above in ancient programs such as Ecco and Keynote which allow me to do this. But to get the equivalent in InfoQube, I have to open the document in MS Word (and every time answer that annoying dialog about mht conversion), and then open the object in the program I used to create it. 

For myself there is little advantage to having note bodies in html, and there is the above-noted disadvantage. Perhaps there could be a global setting to use MS word as the editor for all note bodies, and have it live inside the note editing pane (i.e. inside the InfoQube window)....

Before I cause unintended offence, I would like to take the opportunity to thank PPL for originating the concept, and for following through with a useful implementation. I would not have bothered to criticize if IQ was not worth my time.

Best Regards,
AS