Submitted by jan_rifkinson on 2010/12/08 10:46
Several instances wherein date fields appear as scrambled alphanumerics. There doesn't seem  to be a common denominator
Re-opening program generally corrects problem

Comments

I haven't seen that yet. (If you get chance to screenshot it next time... We'll add it to our hall of fame.)

jan_rifkinson

2010/12/22 10:53

Permalink

bumping 2010/12/22  has this been fixed in beta 925j? If so could it be published?
 

Armando

2010/12/23 15:30

Permalink

I don't think it's been fixed, but who knows. One thing is sure though : we need to be able to reproduce it to be able to fix it. I haven't been able to reproduce it. What are your "options" for that field ? Seems to me that something in the field's configuration could be doing that. Just a hypothesis...

jan_rifkinson

2010/12/24 13:07

Permalink

Option = <format>mm/dd/yyyy</format>