Search Dialog dosen't display "Shown In" field for all records.

Submitted by james8games on 2009/06/09 02:14
When I go to the search dialog and type in "drag", here is the output I get:
 
 
The "Shown In" field is blank for the 5th row when I think it should show "Links".
 
A similar issue is that when additional columns are added, like IDItem, they don't always display the values and the grid needs to be refreshed. This problem is rather intermittent.
 
Thanks,
James.
 

Context Hiearachy problem

Submitted by Al on 2009/06/08 22:04
I was playing around with the blank template that came with .9.24B and the context and regular hiearachy modes don't seem to work as I would expect.
The item Company ABC shows all sub-items, even though the sub-items do not meet the source criteria of the AddressBook being checked. If I were to check the AddressBook box for Called Company ABC 2 and do a refresh I get what I would expect, Parent Company ABC with only the sub-item Called Company ABC 2 showing. This is what I had to do for the Item Joe Clarkes, I checked the AddressBook for Called Joe Clarkes 2, this item had the same problem, showing all sub-items when not checked. Am I missing something?
 
 

sort bug or suggestion

Submitted by jan_rifkinson on 2009/06/08 12:36
Pierre, I'm not sure how to report this as you can see in the subject line but this is the situation:
 
I dragged a link to create an item
item = <a href=http://www.junkluggers.com/index.html>Junkluggers Junk Removal Co.</a>
I changed the text 
text = Junkluggers Junk Removal Co
 
In ascending / descending sort this item is out of sort order because IQ is sorting on the underlying data i.e. the link reference which starts w 'a' while the text starts w 'j'
However in column sort, i.e.

Pierre, What if something happens to you :-)?

Submitted by David_H on 2009/06/08 12:35
Hello Pierre,
 
Just today my beta expired and I have to download the newest version.  This brings to mind a very important issue.  I have no problems committing to a product that is essentially the work of a single developer company because the product is fantastic and it's for myself at this point rather than my company.  But I would like to know that if something happened to you I would not be up the creek.  Specifically, I'd like to know that if something happened to you that my software would not expire.
 
Have you put legal protections in place to make sure this won't happen?  If not, would you consider doing so?  My suggestion is that if something happens to you there should be instructions in place with an attorney to release a non-expiring version.
 
Thank You,
 
David