This may have been covered before:
Each day I open multiple versions of a couple of grids - sometimes different filters, but mostly simply different views, sometimes hoisted.
What exactly is on view so-to-speak fluctuates so seems to me there's no point in making new grids (but maybe should think about that idea).
If I could save these grids as "sub-versions" of the main grid (which would then naturally be shown as "sub-grids" of the main grid in a tree hierarchy)
Or maybe this could be covered by "on close of IQ: remembering the state of open Tabs" - a session manager for IQ
Of course it's possible I should simply reorganise my grids creating a bunch of new ones...
Related thread: Tree view of grids ?
Comments
but,
the more I think about it, the more I realise it's the session-saver / "memory of the last tabs opened (like [FF], chrome, IE)" - that's actually what I mainly need & want.
More background:
I tend to have a few versions of same grid open (in dual or more panes) - mainly to compare content from different parts of the grid, but also to move or copy items. (So filters arent really much of a factor for me personally.)
Now because I use Dropbox I have to close IQ down after each session (otherwise no backup). So at startup I have to rebuild my panes & tabs (life's a chore lol)
the more I think about it, the more I realise it's the session-saver / "memory of the last tabs opened (like [FF], chrome, IE)" - that's actually what I mainly need & want.
[/quote]
More background:
I tend to have a few versions of same grid open (in dual or more panes) - mainly to compare content from different parts of the grid, but also to move or copy items. (So filters arent really much of a factor for me personally.)
Now because I use Dropbox I have to close IQ down after each session (otherwise no backup). So at startup I have to rebuild my panes & tabs (life's a chore lol)