Does anyone use FF3.5 in these forums?  I'm finding that when I reply to posts, the toolbars show up but the textbox is missing.  I don't have any plugins that would interfere I don't think, and IE still works fine.

I discovered today that there was a big difference between the web based Mantis, and my own mantis IQbase. Is there a way to force a complete resync ? What could be wrong ?

(I did the change in the sqlsynch XML file, a while ago -- and  it does sync, but not everything)

Thanks

I'd like to thank all those that have made a donation. Your help is greatly appreciated and helps me concentrating on IQ (as opposed to getting outside contracts to pay the bills).

 

I've sent an email to all those that have donated $50 or more, containing the license info. This license disables the beta version expiration, enabling you to use IQ for as long as you wish.

 

 

Thanks again!

 

Pierre

If confirmed, I can add it to mantis.

Shortcuts to navigate in the grid from the HTML pane don't work well here when there's MHT content for some items.

 

They'll work once but then focus will go to the grid and stay there, which is pointless, of course.

 

(If confirmed, I can add it to mantis.)

When column filter is ON I think that the user should still be able to create a new *visible*  item (in the currently used grid), at least for editing purposes. This is not possible a the moment which makes wiorking with column filters difficult..

Basically, I tried assigning keyboard shortcuts to zoom in/out, and they had the reverse effect.

If confirmed, I can add it to mantis.

Small bug. Could put it in mantis if confirmed.

In Smart Fields (aka smart folders) a discussion started about WikiTags.

 

So here's a thread to talk about it... :)

CamelCase, { } or comma separated...  : I personally don't mind the CamelCase. it takes less space (chars), especially if one is using the same tags all over, not just in IQ. But I think that it could be even simpler : each term put in the WikiTags field (camel case or not) should be a WikiTag, and only for those longer expression would there be a need for {} or what ever. The field already defines specific data, so why also use "{ }" ?   IMO "{ }"  should be used only to reference WikiTags from other fields.

 

Right now, IQ isn't really using a real WikiTag system anyways... since writing a word put in  { } (or [ ], or camel case... in other progs..) in any field doesn't tranform it into a wiki link as it would in a wiki application.