[SORRY  : multiple edits : problems with the English language this afternoon...]

 

This thread follows up a discussion started in the Grid Source EditBox thread from the manual.

 

I'll just continue from there...
 
=========================
 
I understand your point, but a similar argument could be made for the "reverse" situation (where a TLI in a grid with a single source is demoted and a that same TLI disappears from another grid with an "AND binded fields" source) -- and that's why I'm having troubles with IQ automatically removing field assignation in the first place (an opinion you are somewhat corroborating in your example).
 
Following your example, the reverse of is also true :
 

PostBox is an incredible proprietary fork of of the Thunderbird project. It provides a whole lot of functionality missing from Thunderbird and actually gets threaded conversations to work properly.

 

Only downside is that it isn't 100% compatible with Thunderbird extensions, which apparently require a small modification to work (according to the web site)

 

So, assuming this page is truthful and it's not that big of a deal, I'd request a compatible extension for PostBox.

 

Thanks.

Steps to re-create:

Result: user cannot enter date value, i.e. calendar does not appear & entry point becomes 'frozen'

 

--

Jan Rifkinson

Ridgefield CT USA

Hello all IQUsers

 

I'll be on holidays from Aug 14th to 23rd incl. and so I won't be very active on this forum... but active in a different way. With a group of 7 others, I'll be cycling on Virginia's beautiful Blue Ridge Parkway.

 

I hope everything goes fine with this community web site and with the new release (0.9.24E)

 

Pierre

 

In order to prioritise work, I sort items on Itemmodified desc.

 

However, I must somewhere have a rule established which is automatically updating all Items and in the process resetting Itemmodified. This occurs infrequently but of course messes up my prioritised list.

 

Would it be possible and desirable only to update this field if an item was "explicitly" changed? (And no, I'm not exactly certain what I mean by explicitly; perhaps from the keyboard?)

 

Comments and clarifications would be welcome!

 

Mark

I'm trying to establish an auto-assign rule on the Item field in my Inbox.

 

To simplify the situation and to demonstrate what looks like a bug to me, I have set a simplistic rule:

 

am:[Newt]=true

 

When I make a change to Item, I get the warning message:

 

I've put a tab "Manual" on the http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AuX7M353Gsi2dExXSFYtMWZaRjFMVEJ… per Google spreadsheet as a discussion tool

 

I needed something to keep track of what I'm working on on the manual, and thought why not use part of the discussion spreadsheet, and have it colloborative?

 

Any level of user could help via this vehicle--new users, put a comment column "I don't understand such and such of this page".

 

If you see anything missing in the manual, add another line, and call it proposed page or something.

 

Or "I'd like to see".

 

Or put "I have a tremendous amount of time on my hands, and massive InfoQube knowledge--is there anything I can do to help?"

 

A new version is now available (0.9.24E). All users are strongly encouraged to upgrade as the previous version (0.9.24D) had a bug regarding the HTML pane, that could lead to HTML content loss.

 

In this upgrade: